Ethers and Epoxides

The Williamson ether synthesis takes place in two steps. First an alcohol is deprotonated to form a strong nucleophile (RO^-, this step isn't shown in the image below). Then the alkoxide (negative alcohol) attacks an alkyl halide in an S_N2 reaction. 

So this problem is really asking, which step of conditions is most favorable for an S_N2 reaction?

Recall that S_N2 reactions compete with E2 reactions. If the nucleophile is too basic, or if there is too much bulk, it will go E2 instead of S_N2. (See problem 560 for a full explanation of these competition reactions)

Below, the top combination uses the less substituted (1º) alkyl halide, and so is the best for an S_N2 reaction.

The bottom reaction uses a bulkier (2º) alkyl halide, and will probably give a higher percentage of E2 side reaction.

Epoxides can open up in two different ways.

To add a nucleophile to the less substituted side of an epoxide, use basic conditions. This is done in #2 below.

To add a nucleophile to the more substituted side of an epoxide, use acidic conditions. This is done is #1 below.

Why do the conditions matter? Epoxides have two electrophilic carbons. Normally nucleophiles will preferentially attack the less substituted carbon, as they do in S_N2 reactions. Recall that S_N2 reactions usually happen with strong nucleophiles- that is, negative charges (basic conditions).

When an epoxide reacts under acidic conditions, the transition state has carbocation character, and so it's sort of like an S_N1 reaction. That is, instead of less substituted carbons being favored due to less steric bulk, more substituted carbons are favored do to a more stable carbocation. So acidic conditions cause an epoxide to open up on the more substituted side.