carbonyl alpha substitution

A Robinson annulation is just several intramolecular reactions in a row:

    1. Michael addition of an aldehyde and methyl vinyl ketone (butenone).

    2. Intramolecular aldol condensation to form the β-hydroxyl carbonyl (3-hydroxy cyclohexanone).

    3. Elimination to form the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl (cyclohexenone).

a) Adding to alpha position, so this must have come from the combination of an enolate and an electrophile.

b) Adding to the beta position, so this must have come from a Michael addition (also called a conjugate addition).

To carry out a Michael addition, the first step is to convert propanal to an alpha, beta unsaturated carbonyl.

To do this, perform an alpha bromination with (Br₂/H₃O⁺) and then do an E2 elimination (tBuOK/heat).

Then add a Gilman reagent to the alpha,beta unsaturated aldehyde to add a carbon-carbon bond at the beta position.

a) Bromine is an electron withdrawing group (EWG), which makes nearby protons more acidic. So the carbonyl with two bromines is the most acidic.

b) To perform alpha bromination, the enolate (or enol) must first be formed, which then attacks Br₂.

The problem with doing this under basic conditions is that each successive bromination leads to a carbonyl that is more acidic, and so forms an enolate even more easily. So once this reaction starts, it's difficult to control.

Enols are less nucleophilic than enolates, so this react can be controlled under acidic conditions. (Br₂/H3O⁺ instead of Br₂/NaOH).

This problem is similar to problem 746, except each synthesis is a little harder.

The general strategy for carbonyl alpha substitution synthesis problems is the same: locatte the alpha carbon, and remember that the bond is always formed between the alpha and beta carbons.

a) The carbonyl on the left contains the alpha carbon, so that must have been the enolate.

So the beta carbon on the right must have been the electrophile (and been attacked by the enolate).

So how can the beta carbon keep its carbonyl AND keep an -OEt group? Doesn't the -OEt group act as a leaving group in a Claisen condensation? The starting ester must have had two -OEt groups!

b) This one is intimidating because it's intramolecular, but the same logic applies. The left carbonyl has the alpha carbon and so must have been the enolate.

The beta carbon is now an alcohol, so before it was attacked it must have been a ketone (aldol condensation).

c) This is one of the hardest synthesis problems you will see relating to enolates and carbonyl alpha substitution reactions. Why is it hard? Because you have to use a special electrophile.

Usually you add a carbon chain to the alpha position of a carbonyl by reacting an enolate with an alkyl halide, suhc as propyl bromide.

So how do you add a carbon chain that wraps and meets again at the alpha carbon? By using 1,3-dibromo propane and doing two consecutive alkyl additions.

When doing synthesis problems involving enolates (carbonyl alpha substitutions, aldol and Claisen condensations), there are some things to keep in mind:

• The alpha carbon must have been the enolate (nucleophile). So it's importnant to identify the alpha carbon!
• The bond is always made between the alpha and beta carbon.
• Beta hydroxyl products come from aldol condensations (aldehydes/ketones), beta carbonyl products come from Claisen condensations (esters/acid chlorides). (See problem 743 for these mechanisms.)

Also, α,β-unsaturated products come from β-hydroxy products, which come from aldol condensations.

After finding the alpha carbon, it's a good idea to mark the "cut" or "disconnection" where the new bond was formed. This will always be between the alph and beta carbons. I mark this with a dotted line.

a) This product is an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl, which must have come from a β-hydroxyl carbonyl. So this is an aldol condensation.

The α carbon must have come form the enolate. Because the β carbon is an alcohol, the electrophile must have been an aldehyde or ketone. So the two carbons on the right were the enolate, and the two carbons (and phenyl) on the left were an aldehyde.

b) The product is β-keto so this must have been a Claisen condensation.

The β carbon is an ketone, so the electrophile must have been an ester.

There are actually two different combinations of esters that would result in this product. I arbitrarily chose the alpha carbon to belong to the left carbonyl.

c) β-keto product so this must have been a Claisen style condensation. It's easiest if you have the alpha carbon belong to the left carbonyl, so an intramolecule reaction isn't necessary.

The β carbon is already an ester, so the electrophile had to have been more than an ester, as regular esters become ketones after a Claisen condensation.

d) This is a Robinson annulation product, which comes from an intramolecular condensation.

The α,β-unsaturated carbonyl must have come from a β-hydroxyl carbonyl. (aldol condensation)

Because the β carbon became an alcohol, the electrophile must have been an aldehyde or ketone.

When enolates attack, the arrow is drawn from the double bond to the electrophile, and NOT from the negatively charged oxygen! The enolate's carbonyl reforms, and a new bond is created at the alpha position.

But Aldehydes and ketones react differently than ester and acid chlorides.

a) Aldehydes and ketones are oxidation state II carbonyls (the carbonyl has carbon-heteroatom bonds- the double bonded oxygen counts twice).

They do not have a built-in leaving group, and so undergo nucleophilic acyl addition reactions. The carbonyl on the electrophile becomes an alcohol.

So the product from this reaction is a beta hydroxyl carbonyl. If this β-hydroxyl carbonyl is heated up, the hydroxyl will eliminate to from an alpha, beta unsaturated carbonyl.

The mechanism for a) is very similiar to that of an aldol condensation reaction.

b) Esters (and acid chlorides) are oxidation state III carbonyls (the carbonyl carbon has three carbon-heteroatom bonds). They have a built-in leaving group (^-OR in the case of an ester, and Cl^- for an acid chloride), and so undergo nucleophilic acyl substitution reactions. ("up, down, kick"). The carbonyl on the electrophile is reformed.

So the product from this reaction is a beta keto carbonyl.

The mechanism for b) is very similiar to that of a Claisen condensation reaction.

Enamines attack alkyl halides just as enolates do.

The trick to the Stock enamine synthesis is to remember how enamines (and imines) are related to carbonyls:

• Enamines are formed from carbonyls and 2º amines.
• Enamines (and imines) are converted back to carbonyls with H₃O⁺ (acidic hydrolysis).

Enols are just like enolates in that they attack electrophiles and add to the alpha position.

Unlike in problem 739 in which enolates were formed in two steps, enolate formation is usually drawn in one step, as shown below.

Enolates then can attack electrophiles (alkyl halides, carbonyls, etc.) to make new bonds at the alpha position.

Notice that after an alpha substitution reaction the carbonyl is reformed, and so can react again.