Concept (explain why this is so..)

Every proton on cyclohexane appears identical, but remember than cyclohexane is usually in a chair form, so there are really two types of protons: axial and equatorial.

In theory each of these two protons should give its own NMR peak. But at room temperature the molecule is undergoing chair flip so rapidly the two peaks converge into one.

But at low temperature the rate of chair flip slows down enough that two distinct peaks emerge.

There are four types of protons (hydrogens) in the compound below, so we would expect to see four peaks (A, B, C, and D).

A is not adjacent to any other types of protons, so its multiplicity is 1, also called singlet (s). ( n=0, so n + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1). A also is a CH3, so it will have an integration of 3. Finally, A's proton are on a carbon adjacent to an oxygen, so its chemical shit will be about ~4 ppm.

B is a CH2 so its integration is 2. It's adjacent to a 2 hydrogens (a CH₂ ) so its multiplicty is 3, also called a triplet (t). (n=2, so n + 1 = 3). B is also adjacent to oxygen, so it will be close to ~4 ppm, but a little further downfield than A because it's more substituted than A.

C is also a CH2 so its integration is 2. It's also adjacent to 2 hydrogens so it's a triplet (n+1 rule). C's hydrogens are on a carbon adjacent to a carbonyl (C=O), so its chemical shift will be around ~2 ppm.

D is an aldehyde proton, which is always a singlet with near ~10 ppm. It's only one proton, so its integration is 1.

Note: notice that the aldehyde proton doesn't couple to another other protons! So even through C is surrounded by a CH₂ on its left and an aldehyde proton on its right, when determining multiplicity we only count the CH₂, and not the aldehyde proton.

Note that some textbooks don't draw EAS electrophiles with formal positive charges.

Some textbooks instead draw electrophiles with partial positive charges and a leaving group. It's just a convention, and doesn't affect the product of an EAS reaction. See the problem 595 for an explanation of the difference.

Friedel-Crafts alkylation is prone to carbocation rearrangement. In this case, alkylation produced a 1º carbocation which rearranged to a 3º carbocation, leading to compound B.

We can avoid this by instead doing Friedel-Crafts acylation. The intermediate in acylation is the acylium ion, which is stabilized by resonance and so won't rearrange.

But after the acylation reaction we have to get rid of the carbonyl (C=O) group, so we do a Wolff-Kishner reduction (N₂H₄/NaOH, heat).

a) The species on the left are much more stable than the species on the right because they have complete octets.

Nitrogen is less electronegative than oxygen, so a positive nitrogen (with a full octect) is more stable than a positive oxygen; oxygen is electronegative and so doesn't "like" being positive (have low electron density). 

The carbocation and the "nitrocation" are both very unstable because they only have 6 valence electrons. Because nitrogen is more electronegative than carbon, the nitrocation is even less stable than the carbocation, because its worse at handling a positive charge.

b) The cation intermediates that result from substitution at C-3 only contain carbocations, while the intermdiates from C-2 or C-4 substitution contain a "nitrocation," which is less stable than a regular carbocation, and so are not favored. So pyridine undergoes EAS reactions at C-3.

One more note: For substitution at C-2 and C-4, it's tempting to draw a resonance form where the positive charge is on the nitrogen, which is flanked by two double bonds. But this cyclic compound is too strained to exist, and so doesn't contribute to this analysis.

Substitution at C-1 and C-2 both lead to many resonance forms. But the resonance forms that arrise from substitution at C-2 are not aromatic, while the resonance forms from substitution at C-1 are aromatic (the benzene ring is maintained).

So the C-1 resonance forms are more stable than the C-2 resonance forms, so substitution occurs at C-1 instead of C-2.

Electrophilic substitution at C-2 leads to a carbocation intermediate with three resonance forms, while substitution at C-3 leads to a carbocation intermediate with only two resonance forms.

The C-2 intermediate has more resonance forms than the C-3 intermediate, and so is more stable. Therefore, EAS occurs at C-2.

Short answer: -NO₂ is an meta director because the cyclohexadienyl intermediates that result from meta addtition are more stable than those that result from ortho or para addition.

Long answer: Addition at both the ortho or para positions lead to a cyclohexadienyl cation that contains two adjacent positive charges. This is very unstable, and so addition at the ortho or para positions is not favored.

The cyclohexadienyl cations that result from meta addition don't have this problem.

This will be the base for any substituent that has a positive charge (or partial positive charge). So -NO₂, -C(O)R, -CF₃, -NH₃⁺, -CN, and -SO₃R are all meta directors.

Short answer: -OR is an ortho/para director because the cyclohexadienyl intermediates that result from ortho and para addtitions are more stable than those that result from meta addition.

Long answer: The cyclohexadienyl intermediates from ortho and para addition include a resonance form where the oxygen is adjacent to the carbocation, while the cyclohexadienyl intermediates from a meta addition do not.

When an oxygen (or anything with a lone pair) is adjacent to a carbocation, it can share its lone pair and stabilize the positive charge. This is only possible when the electrophile adds to the ortho or para positions, so those positions are favored with -OR as a substituent. Hence, -OR is an ortho/para director.

Note that this logic holds for any substituent with a lone pair, so -OH, -OR, -NH₂, -NR₂, -F, -Cl, -Br, and -I are all ortho/para directors.

The resonance forms for EDG add electron density to the ring (and add a negative charge), while the resonance forms for EWG remove electron density from the ring (and leave a positive charge). This is where the terms electron donating group and electron withdrawing group come from.

EAS reactions require benzene to attack something positive (an electrophile), so the more electron density, the better. This is why EDG tend to speed up EAS reactions, while EWG slow down EAS reactions.

Notice that for EDG, the ortho and para positions are partially negative. In EAS reactions benzene attacks a positively charged electrophile, so its not too surprising that the electrophile will want to add at o/p if a EDG is present.

But for EWG, the o/p positions pick up a partial positive charge. So for EAS reactions with a EWG, it's not surprising that the electrophile will avoid the o/p positions, and add meta instead.

This is one explanation for the general trend: 

• EDG are ortho/para directors and activating.
• EWG are meta directors and deactivating.