Organic Chemistry

Reductive amination is a two step process. First, an imine or enamine is formed from a carbonyl and an imine.

Then, a the imine (or enamine) is reduced to an amine (using reducing agents such as H₂, NaBH₄, NaBH₃(CN), NaBH(OAc)₃, etc.). For practice on forming imine and enamines, see problem 712).

Electron withdrawing groups (EWG) reduce electron density and reduce basicity. Resonance delocalizes electron density and so also decreases basicity (the electrons are less available to pick up a proton).

Electron donating groups (EDG) add electron density and increase basicity.

Alkyl groups are weakly EDG (induction), and hydrogen is neither EDG nor EWG. So cyclohexylamine (compound X) is a stronger base than ammonia (compound W).

Aniline (compound Y) has resonance, so it is less basic than compound X, which does not have resonance.

N-acyl aniline (compound Z) has more resonance forms than aniline, so it will be the least basic.

So the overall over is:

(most basic) X > W > Y > Z (least basic)

sp² carbons are more electronegative (electron withdrawing) than sp³ carbons due to increased s-character. Electron withdrawing groups (EWG) make acids more acidic and bases less basic.

For this reason, piperidine (compound A) is the more basic than pyridine (compound B):

(more basic) A > B (less basic)

Nitro (-NO₂) is an EWG, so 4-nitropyridine (compound C) will be less basic than compound A.

Dimethylamine is an electron donating group (EDG), so it adds electron density to pyridine and increases basicity. So dimethylamino pyridine (DMAP, compound D) will be more basic than compound A:

(more basic) D > B > C (less basic)

So how does compound A compare with compound D? There is no way of predicting this based on EWG/EDG rules alone. After all, what should be more basic: piperidine, which has sp³ carbons (increases base strength), or DMAP, which has sp² carbons (decreases base strength) but also an EDG (increases base strength) ?

There's no way to tell. But it turns out that Piperidine is a little more basic than DMAP. So the overal order is:

(more basic) A > D > B > C (least basic)

A Robinson annulation is just several intramolecular reactions in a row:

    1. Michael addition of an aldehyde and methyl vinyl ketone (butenone).

    2. Intramolecular aldol condensation to form the β-hydroxyl carbonyl (3-hydroxy cyclohexanone).

    3. Elimination to form the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl (cyclohexenone).

a) Adding to alpha position, so this must have come from the combination of an enolate and an electrophile.

b) Adding to the beta position, so this must have come from a Michael addition (also called a conjugate addition).

To carry out a Michael addition, the first step is to convert propanal to an alpha, beta unsaturated carbonyl.

To do this, perform an alpha bromination with (Br₂/H₃O⁺) and then do an E2 elimination (tBuOK/heat).

Then add a Gilman reagent to the alpha,beta unsaturated aldehyde to add a carbon-carbon bond at the beta position.

a) Bromine is an electron withdrawing group (EWG), which makes nearby protons more acidic. So the carbonyl with two bromines is the most acidic.

b) To perform alpha bromination, the enolate (or enol) must first be formed, which then attacks Br₂.

The problem with doing this under basic conditions is that each successive bromination leads to a carbonyl that is more acidic, and so forms an enolate even more easily. So once this reaction starts, it's difficult to control.

Enols are less nucleophilic than enolates, so this react can be controlled under acidic conditions. (Br₂/H3O⁺ instead of Br₂/NaOH).

This problem is similar to problem 746, except each synthesis is a little harder.

The general strategy for carbonyl alpha substitution synthesis problems is the same: locatte the alpha carbon, and remember that the bond is always formed between the alpha and beta carbons.

a) The carbonyl on the left contains the alpha carbon, so that must have been the enolate.

So the beta carbon on the right must have been the electrophile (and been attacked by the enolate).

So how can the beta carbon keep its carbonyl AND keep an -OEt group? Doesn't the -OEt group act as a leaving group in a Claisen condensation? The starting ester must have had two -OEt groups!

b) This one is intimidating because it's intramolecular, but the same logic applies. The left carbonyl has the alpha carbon and so must have been the enolate.

The beta carbon is now an alcohol, so before it was attacked it must have been a ketone (aldol condensation).

c) This is one of the hardest synthesis problems you will see relating to enolates and carbonyl alpha substitution reactions. Why is it hard? Because you have to use a special electrophile.

Usually you add a carbon chain to the alpha position of a carbonyl by reacting an enolate with an alkyl halide, suhc as propyl bromide.

So how do you add a carbon chain that wraps and meets again at the alpha carbon? By using 1,3-dibromo propane and doing two consecutive alkyl additions.

When doing synthesis problems involving enolates (carbonyl alpha substitutions, aldol and Claisen condensations), there are some things to keep in mind:

• The alpha carbon must have been the enolate (nucleophile). So it's importnant to identify the alpha carbon!
• The bond is always made between the alpha and beta carbon.
• Beta hydroxyl products come from aldol condensations (aldehydes/ketones), beta carbonyl products come from Claisen condensations (esters/acid chlorides). (See problem 743 for these mechanisms.)

Also, α,β-unsaturated products come from β-hydroxy products, which come from aldol condensations.

After finding the alpha carbon, it's a good idea to mark the "cut" or "disconnection" where the new bond was formed. This will always be between the alph and beta carbons. I mark this with a dotted line.

a) This product is an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl, which must have come from a β-hydroxyl carbonyl. So this is an aldol condensation.

The α carbon must have come form the enolate. Because the β carbon is an alcohol, the electrophile must have been an aldehyde or ketone. So the two carbons on the right were the enolate, and the two carbons (and phenyl) on the left were an aldehyde.

b) The product is β-keto so this must have been a Claisen condensation.

The β carbon is an ketone, so the electrophile must have been an ester.

There are actually two different combinations of esters that would result in this product. I arbitrarily chose the alpha carbon to belong to the left carbonyl.

c) β-keto product so this must have been a Claisen style condensation. It's easiest if you have the alpha carbon belong to the left carbonyl, so an intramolecule reaction isn't necessary.

The β carbon is already an ester, so the electrophile had to have been more than an ester, as regular esters become ketones after a Claisen condensation.

d) This is a Robinson annulation product, which comes from an intramolecular condensation.

The α,β-unsaturated carbonyl must have come from a β-hydroxyl carbonyl. (aldol condensation)

Because the β carbon became an alcohol, the electrophile must have been an aldehyde or ketone.

Hydrogens D and E are alpha to two carbonyls and so will be the more acidic than C, which is only alpha to one carbonyl. This is because the enolates that arise from deprotonate at D and E have more resonance forms than the enolate that arrises at C.

Because ketones are more electron withdrawing than esters, D will be more acidic than E. So far we have:

D > E > C > (other)

The carbanions that would arrise from deprotonation of carbons A and B both do not have any resonance forms, so we don't expect either to be acidic. But because A is next to a fluorine atom, which is an electron withdrawing group, A will be more acidic than B. So the overall order is:

(most acidic) D > E > C > A > B (least acidic)

Carbonyls are in equilibrium with their enol forms. This process is called keto-enol tautomerization. (See problems 738 and 739). So when this compound is placed in water a small amount of it will constantly be converted to its enol form, and then back again to the carbonyl form.

But the enol form is achiral! (the alpha carbon is sp² instead of sp³ as in the carbonyl form).

So when the achiral enol goes back to its carbonyl form, half will become (S) and the other half will become (R). The stereocenter becomes "scrambled." The process of an optically pure compound becoming a racemic mixture is called racemization.